Search for the product you are looking for
研发中心

News

Slide down

Comparison of Two Cooling Methods for Constant Temperature and Humidity Test Chambers

Source:LINPIN Time:2025-05-08 Category:Industry News

Cooling is a critical aspect of constant temperature and humidity test chambers. The two most common cooling methods are water-cooled (chilled water) and air-cooled. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Below is a detailed comparison:

1. Water-Cooled (Chilled Water) System
Advantages:
Strong environmental adaptability – Suitable for large-scale equipment such as rapid temperature change test chambers, thermal shock test chambers, and walk-in constant temperature rooms.
High heat dissipation efficiency – More reliable for high-power applications.
Stable performance – Better for long-duration tests requiring precise temperature control.
Disadvantages:
Water quality is crucial – Impurities in water can reduce cooling efficiency and even cause system damage.
Risk of leaks – Aging or damaged pipes may lead to water leakage, potentially causing electrical short circuits.
Maintenance costs – Requires installation of strong magnetic water treatment systems or electronic water treatment systems to prevent scaling. Without proper treatment, cooling efficiency will degrade over time.
Higher operating costs – Additional expenses for water treatment, descaling, and pipe maintenance.

constant temperature and humidity test chambers
2. Air-Cooled System
Advantages:
Simple structure, low maintenance cost – No need for cooling water pumps, cooling towers, or complex piping systems.
No water-related risks – Eliminates issues like pipe clogging, scaling in condensers, and water leakage.
Water-saving – No water consumption, making it more environmentally friendly.
Cost-effective – Preferred by many customers due to lower installation and operational expenses.
Disadvantages:
Limited cooling capacity – Not suitable for high-power equipment (generally not recommended for devices above 20kW).
Lower heat dissipation efficiency – May struggle with large-scale equipment (e.g., walk-in chambers).
Dependent on ambient temperature – Performance may vary in extremely hot environments.
Conclusion: Which One to Choose?
For small to medium-sized chambers (4–10kW), air-cooled systems are usually more economical and easier to maintain.
For large-scale or high-power equipment (e.g., walk-in chambers, rapid temperature change tests), water-cooled systems provide better stability and cooling efficiency but require higher maintenance.
If you need further guidance on selecting the right cooling system for your test chamber, feel free to contact us at 400-066-2888 for professional advice!

News Recommendation
Beneath its tough exterior, the low-temperature test chamber has a gentle heart. Why do we say that?
Many people still have questions about rain test chambers. Today, we’ll address a few of them.
The high-low temperature test chamber is the cornerstone of environmental reliability testing. Its cooling rate dictates test duration and data validity. Field data from 500+ chambers over ten years show that “slow cooling” accounts for 38 % of all malfunctions, second only to “no cooling”.
In the market, thermal shock test chambers come in two types: two-chamber and three-chamber designs. Some customers may wonder which type to choose—can they opt for a three-chamber model?
As a precision testing instrument, the high-low temperature test chamber is designed to evaluate how products withstand changes in environmental temperature and humidity.
Product Recommendation
Telegram WhatsApp Facebook VK LinkedIn