Search for the product you are looking for
研发中心

News

Slide down

Key Factors Causing Errors in Salt Spray Test Chambers

Source:LINPIN Time:2025-04-29 Category:Industry News

Salt spray test chambers evaluate the corrosion resistance of samples by exposing them to a corrosive salt mist, allowing comparison with other products. These tests can be categorized into three types:

Neutral Salt Spray (NSS) Test
Copper-Accelerated Acetic Acid Salt Spray (CASS) Test
Acidified Salt Spray (AASS) Test
The test process involves atomizing a corrosive solution into a fine mist and spraying it uniformly onto samples. After repeated cycles, corrosion begins to appear, and the time taken for corrosion to occur is recorded—shorter times indicate poorer corrosion resistance. However, several factors can introduce errors in test results.

Salt spray test chambers

Main Causes of Errors in Salt Spray Testing
1. Unstable Test Samples
If samples degrade or change properties during prolonged testing, even a high-performance chamber cannot provide accurate data.
2. Environmental or Human-Induced Errors
Deviations from preset conditions (temperature, humidity, airflow) can distort results.
External factors like power fluctuations, electromagnetic interference, or ambient temperature changes may alter the test environment.
3. Equipment-Related Issues
Aging components (nozzles, heaters, sensors) or mechanical wear can affect spray consistency and chamber performance.
Faulty auxiliary devices (pH meters, air compressors) may introduce measurement inaccuracies.
4. Improper Operation
Incorrect parameter settings (spray volume, temperature, test duration).
Approximate calculations instead of precise measurements lead to unreliable data.
5. Limitations of Salt Spray Testing
Results from identical metal samples cannot predict long-term corrosion resistance in real-world conditions.
However, compared to traditional methods, salt spray chambers provide more controlled and repeatable corrosion data in simulated salt-polluted environments.
Conclusion
To minimize errors, ensure:
✅ Stable sample preparation
✅ Strict environmental control
✅ Regular equipment maintenance
✅ Proper operator training

By addressing these factors, test accuracy and repeatability can be significantly improved.

News Recommendation
A formaldehyde/VOC environmental test chamber consists of a chamber body and various components, all of which play critical roles in the operation of the equipment. Over prolonged use, components may wear out and require maintenance or replacement if severely degraded. But how often should these parts be replaced?
Dust testing, codified in GB/T 2423.37 and IEC 60068-2-68, is now mandatory for proving the sealing integrity and reliability of military, automotive, photovoltaic and rail-transit products. Direct test outlays—consumables, energy, labour and depreciation—seldom exceed one to three per cent of the selling price, yet hidden expenses triggered by poor chamber selection—repeat tests, invalid data or after-sales downtime—can leap to eight to twelve per cent.
Cooling is a critical aspect of constant temperature and humidity test chambers. The two most common cooling methods are water-cooled (chilled water) and air-cooled. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
During the operation of a temperature and humidity test chamber, some abnormal situations may occur, such as excessive overheating of the condenser tube.
Cold and thermal shock test chamber on the market is divided into two categories, a two-compartment type, including high-temperature region and low-temperature region, the test object were in two different temperatures in the area of the test, hot and cold alternating test; the other is a three-compartment type, in addition to high-temperature and low-temperature areas, there is also a test area, and the two-compartment different is that the three-compartment does not need to be directly in the test area for the test, only need to be through the air compression method
Product Recommendation
Telegram WhatsApp Facebook VK LinkedIn