Search for the product you are looking for
研发中心

News

Slide down

Key Factors Causing Errors in Salt Spray Test Chambers

Source:LINPIN Time:2025-04-29 Category:Industry News

Salt spray test chambers evaluate the corrosion resistance of samples by exposing them to a corrosive salt mist, allowing comparison with other products. These tests can be categorized into three types:

Neutral Salt Spray (NSS) Test
Copper-Accelerated Acetic Acid Salt Spray (CASS) Test
Acidified Salt Spray (AASS) Test
The test process involves atomizing a corrosive solution into a fine mist and spraying it uniformly onto samples. After repeated cycles, corrosion begins to appear, and the time taken for corrosion to occur is recorded—shorter times indicate poorer corrosion resistance. However, several factors can introduce errors in test results.

Salt spray test chambers

Main Causes of Errors in Salt Spray Testing
1. Unstable Test Samples
If samples degrade or change properties during prolonged testing, even a high-performance chamber cannot provide accurate data.
2. Environmental or Human-Induced Errors
Deviations from preset conditions (temperature, humidity, airflow) can distort results.
External factors like power fluctuations, electromagnetic interference, or ambient temperature changes may alter the test environment.
3. Equipment-Related Issues
Aging components (nozzles, heaters, sensors) or mechanical wear can affect spray consistency and chamber performance.
Faulty auxiliary devices (pH meters, air compressors) may introduce measurement inaccuracies.
4. Improper Operation
Incorrect parameter settings (spray volume, temperature, test duration).
Approximate calculations instead of precise measurements lead to unreliable data.
5. Limitations of Salt Spray Testing
Results from identical metal samples cannot predict long-term corrosion resistance in real-world conditions.
However, compared to traditional methods, salt spray chambers provide more controlled and repeatable corrosion data in simulated salt-polluted environments.
Conclusion
To minimize errors, ensure:
✅ Stable sample preparation
✅ Strict environmental control
✅ Regular equipment maintenance
✅ Proper operator training

By addressing these factors, test accuracy and repeatability can be significantly improved.

News Recommendation
In the market, thermal shock test chambers come in two types: two-chamber and three-chamber designs. Some customers may wonder which type to choose—can they opt for a three-chamber model?
Dust testing, codified in GB/T 2423.37 and IEC 60068-2-68, is now mandatory for proving the sealing integrity and reliability of military, automotive, photovoltaic and rail-transit products. Direct test outlays—consumables, energy, labour and depreciation—seldom exceed one to three per cent of the selling price, yet hidden expenses triggered by poor chamber selection—repeat tests, invalid data or after-sales downtime—can leap to eight to twelve per cent.
A high-temperature test chamber simulates extreme heat environments to evaluate the performance of test specimens. But how does prolonged exposure to high temperatures affect these specimens? This article explains the potential impacts of high temperatures on various materials.
Following our previous discussion on the effects of high-temperature environmental testing, this paper systematically summarizes the typical property changes that occur in test specimens within low-temperature test chambers (hereinafter referred to as “the equipment”).
Safety for any test chamber is very important, now the equipment are set up to protect the measures, in addition to these self-protection warning, in the usual use of equipment in the process also need to pay attention to the following points.
Product Recommendation
Telegram WhatsApp Facebook VK LinkedIn